A customer requested a refund for a pair of boots after 4 months
A foreign customer who had purchased a pair of boots in July asked to repair the boots’ in December. When he asked for the repair the seller indicated that it would take about a week to fix the zipper. However, a week later, when he went to the shop to pick up the repaired boots, the seller asked him to wait for a month because the boots was imported from overseas and needed to ship to the original country to be fixed. As it was a high priced item, the customer felt it was wrong that defects appeared within the first 4 month of ownership. This fact, along with the fact that the inconvenient service of not keeping the promise the seller had made, the customer requested a refund. The seller declined. Therefore, the customer requested help from Seoul Global Center.
Seoul Global Center first made an inquiry to the business’ side of the story. According to the seller, the boots were imported from Japan and made out of specific materials which cannot be found in Korea. It was possible to fix the boots with different material, but the customer requested the original material be used. Therefore, the seller explained the reason for the delay, but refused to give a refund for the boots because it passed the return policy period. However, the seller made a promise to provide the full service to fix the boots as soon as possible.
According to the Regulations on Consumer Dispute Resolution, in a case where a purchased product is defected or cannot be fixed, a producer or a seller has the responsibility to replace the defective product with a new product or to refund the amount of purchased product, unless the cause of the damage was determined to be the fault of the customer.
In this case, the boots were broken after only 4 months and were past the return period. The customer is responsible for the fee to get the boots fixed. Even though the seller made a promise to fix the boots and couldn’t meet the deadline, it was an unavoidable circumstance for the seller. As the seller was trying to provide an extra service for the product, without any kind of service charge, the customer was not required to give a refund.
However, the customer insisted on a full refund of the boots due to his flight back to his country in 2 weeks. The seller did not accept the request, but offered to send the boots to the customer’s country upon it’s complete repair. The Seoul Global Center arbitrated the situation by working to ensure that the customer will receive their item by the promised date. In the event that the seller did not keep their promise, the Global Center also agreed to get proper compensation on behalf of the customer.
After the promised date, no contact was made by the customer. The Seoul Global Center contacted the seller to verify the result of this dispute, and confirmed that the customer visited the store and picked up the fixed boots.
As seen in the case above, items damaged by fault of the purchaser are not necessarily required to be repaired or refunded by the seller. In these cases, if the seller agrees to repair the item, they are entitled to charge a service fee.
Written by Yi, Seong-Ock
Consumer counselor at the Seoul Global Center
Tel) 02-2075-4129